top of page

You think it’s hard to get a remand? Try getting paid.

tower law group disability case

The recent Eleventh Circuit case, Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security, on January 22, 2025 highlights just how tricky it can be to secure fair attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Let’s break it down.


The Background


Smith and Ackerman, successful plaintiffs in Social Security cases, secured remands at the district court level. As prevailing parties, they applied for EAJA attorney’s fees with detailed timesheets. The Commissioner didn’t oppose their requests, but the district court flagged certain entries as block-billed and imposed a 40% reduction on those entries.


The Eleventh Circuit’s Take


The appellate court acknowledged that block billing, where multiple tasks are lumped into one time entry, can be problematic. For example, Smith’s time entry read: “Continue reviewing administrative record, conduct research, continue drafting arguments.” The court noted that such entries made it “impossible to determine the amount of time counsel spent on each of the specific tasks mentioned in the block-billed entries.”


However, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the district court went too far with its “arbitrary” 40% cut. As the court put it:


  • “A district court must do more than eyeball the request and if it seems excessive cut it down by an arbitrary percentage.” (Citing Johnston v. Borders)

  • It further stressed the need for “principled reasons” and clear calculations when making reductions, reminding courts of their obligation to “articulate the decisions [they] made.”


The district court’s failure to justify its across-the-board reduction led the Eleventh Circuit to vacate and remand the fee determination.


Why This Decision Is Important


  1. Transparency in Billing: Even for closely related tasks (like reviewing records and drafting arguments), attorneys must break down their time entries to avoid reductions.

  2. Judicial Consistency: This case spotlights the need for courts to articulate their reasoning behind fee adjustments, ensuring fairness and predictability.

  3. Advocacy for Attorneys: Getting a remand is only part of the battle, ensuring proper compensation for our work is equally crucial.


Practice Pointers


  • Avoid block billing entirely. A little extra effort in your records can save a lot of headache later.

  • If faced with reductions, push for a well-reasoned explanation and challenge arbitrary percentages.

  • Use this case as a reminder to refine your billing practices and support fee petitions with meticulous detail.


Have you ever faced challenges with EAJA fees or other fee petitions?

4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


TLG Logo - White.jpeg
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow.png
IG Logo - Gold.png
Facebook Logo - Gold.png
TLG X Logo.png
TLG Linked In Footer Logo.png

FLORIDA

3505 Lake Lynda Dr., Suite 200

Orlando, FL 32817

INDIANA

333 North Alabama St., Suite 350

Indianapolis, IN 46204

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group.

Copyright © 2025 Tower Law Group All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  | Disclaimer  | Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use

 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

We appreciate your interest in Tower Law Group. Please know that our website is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal advice and visitors to our website should not take action upon this information without first discussing it with a legal professional.

 

Your visit to this website or transmission of information does not create an attorney-client relationship with Tower Law Group generally, or any of its attorneys. If you wish to contact anyone at Tower Law Group please do not disclose any information that you consider to be confidential in that communication. Before an attorney-client relationship can be established, an attorney from Tower Law Group will need to confirm that the firm does not already represent another entity involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation.

 

Tower Law Group will regard any information or materials you transmit as confidential only after this confirmation by the firm to you that it is willing to accept representation. Until such time, all unsolicited inquiries or information received by Tower Law Group will not be regarded as confidential, even if considered confidential by you, and will not preclude the firm from accepting representation of other entities that may be adverse to your interests.

Custom law firm websites from Practice42.
The hiring of a lawyer in an important decision that should not be based on advertising.
The information on this website is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice.
The use of the website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.

practice-white.png
bottom of page