top of page

When ALJs Get Kids’ Disability Cases Wrong

I have handled kids' disability claims, so I know how critical it is for ALJs to get it right. And even though these cases are not common, they are very important.


 So, let’s talk about Knight v. Colvin, a 10th Circuit remand from 2014 (yep, a long time ago now) specifically because the ALJ failed to properly evaluate credibility, medical evidence, and functional limitations under the child disability listings.


 🔹 The Case at a Glance


P.K., a minor, applied for SSI due to ADHD, a learning disability, and other mental health conditions. Despite evidence of significant impairments, including suicidal ideation, self-harm, and aggressive behavior, the ALJ found she was not disabled, concluding that her limitations were “less than marked.”


But the Tenth Circuit disagreed.


🔹 Where the ALJ Went Wrong


First, the ALJ failed to properly assess the credibility of P.K.’s mother’s testimony, dismissing it with generic language rather than making specific findings. Courts have made it clear: a parent's testimony in child cases must be evaluated just as the child’s would be.


 Second, Dr. Hall, who treated P.K. for three years, found her extremely impaired in social functioning. The ALJ discounted this, claiming Dr. Hall relied too much on subjective reports and only managed medication. The court called this out. Long-term psychiatric care is valid medical evidence.


 Third, to qualify under the child disability listing, a claimant must show an “extreme” limitation in one domain or “marked” limitations in two. The ALJ downplayed clear evidence of severe limitations in interacting with others and caring for oneself, despite documented self-harm and aggressive behavior.


🔹 Insights:


 This case is a reminder that ALJs often misapply SSA’s childhood disability framework. When arguing these cases:


 ✅ Demand specific credibility findings, boilerplate language won’t cut it.


 ✅ Challenge the ALJ’s failure to give proper weight to treating physicians.


 ✅ Push for a thorough domain-by-domain analysis using SSR 09-1p’s “whole child” approach.


Got any questions? Schedule a consultation with us. I’m here to help. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll get through it together. After all, navigating these waters is always easier when you’ve got someone to chat with.

Komentarze


TLG Logo - White.jpeg
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow.png
IG Logo - Gold.png
Facebook Logo - Gold.png
TLG X Logo.png
TLG Linked In Footer Logo.png

FLORIDA

3505 Lake Lynda Dr., Suite 200

Orlando, FL 32817

INDIANA

333 North Alabama St., Suite 350

Indianapolis, IN 46204

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group.

Copyright © 2025 Tower Law Group All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  | Disclaimer  | Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use

 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

We appreciate your interest in Tower Law Group. Please know that our website is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal advice and visitors to our website should not take action upon this information without first discussing it with a legal professional.

 

Your visit to this website or transmission of information does not create an attorney-client relationship with Tower Law Group generally, or any of its attorneys. If you wish to contact anyone at Tower Law Group please do not disclose any information that you consider to be confidential in that communication. Before an attorney-client relationship can be established, an attorney from Tower Law Group will need to confirm that the firm does not already represent another entity involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation.

 

Tower Law Group will regard any information or materials you transmit as confidential only after this confirmation by the firm to you that it is willing to accept representation. Until such time, all unsolicited inquiries or information received by Tower Law Group will not be regarded as confidential, even if considered confidential by you, and will not preclude the firm from accepting representation of other entities that may be adverse to your interests.

Custom law firm websites from Practice42.
The hiring of a lawyer in an important decision that should not be based on advertising.
The information on this website is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice.
The use of the website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.

practice-white.png
bottom of page