top of page

Remanded Case from the Seventh Circuit

social security cases tower law group

We're pleased to share with you that, on July 1, 2024, the Seventh Circuit issued a remand!


In Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security, the Seventh Circuit recently tackled the complex issue of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) post-Gisbrecht. Arnold's case, initially denied but remanded by the district court, resulted in a favorable ALJ decision awarding $160,797.10 in past-due benefits.

Arnold’s legal team sought fees based on a contingency agreement, capped at 25% of past-due benefits.


However, the district court opted to reduce this significantly, awarding only $16,920 instead of the requested $40,199.27, citing concerns over a perceived "windfall" based on hourly rates.


Central to the case was whether the district court properly applied § 406(b) standards in light of Gisbrecht v. Barnhart (2002), which underscores the importance of contingency fee agreements while allowing courts to ensure fees remain reasonable.


The Seventh Circuit determined that the district court erred in not giving sufficient weight to the contingency agreement, instead focusing too heavily on hourly rates—a departure from Gisbrecht’s directive.


Key Points


1. The Seventh Circuit criticized the district court for not starting its analysis with the contingency fee agreement, adjusting only as necessary based on specific considerations.


2. Comparisons to unrelated Second Amendment cases using the lodestar method were deemed inappropriate, as they differ fundamentally from § 406(b) cases analyzed under Gisbrecht.


3. The Seventh Circuit emphasized that the district court’s assessment of the case’s lack of extraordinary challenges did not justify such a substantial fee reduction without a proper analysis grounded in the contingency agreement.


In response, the Seventh Circuit vacated the decision and remanded the case, instructing the district court to reassess the fee request using the correct legal standards, with the contingency fee agreement as the primary consideration.


Got any questions? Schedule a consultation with us. I’m here to help. It’s a lot to take in, but we’ll get through it together. After all, navigating these waters is always easier when you’ve got someone to chat with.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Комментарии


TLG Logo - White.jpeg
Phone Icon - TLG Yellow.png
IG Logo - Gold.png
Facebook Logo - Gold.png
TLG X Logo.png
TLG Linked In Footer Logo.png

FLORIDA

3505 Lake Lynda Dr., Suite 200

Orlando, FL 32817

INDIANA

333 North Alabama St., Suite 350

Indianapolis, IN 46204

STAY UP TO DATE

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with Tower Law Group.

Copyright © 2025 Tower Law Group All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  | Disclaimer  | Law Firm Accessibility Statement  |  Terms of Use

 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

We appreciate your interest in Tower Law Group. Please know that our website is provided for informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal advice and visitors to our website should not take action upon this information without first discussing it with a legal professional.

 

Your visit to this website or transmission of information does not create an attorney-client relationship with Tower Law Group generally, or any of its attorneys. If you wish to contact anyone at Tower Law Group please do not disclose any information that you consider to be confidential in that communication. Before an attorney-client relationship can be established, an attorney from Tower Law Group will need to confirm that the firm does not already represent another entity involved in the matter and that the firm is willing to accept representation.

 

Tower Law Group will regard any information or materials you transmit as confidential only after this confirmation by the firm to you that it is willing to accept representation. Until such time, all unsolicited inquiries or information received by Tower Law Group will not be regarded as confidential, even if considered confidential by you, and will not preclude the firm from accepting representation of other entities that may be adverse to your interests.

Custom law firm websites from Practice42.
The hiring of a lawyer in an important decision that should not be based on advertising.
The information on this website is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice.
The use of the website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.

practice-white.png
bottom of page